What Types Of Breast Implants Are Available In Beverly Hills & Los Angeles

There were different views over the years on the best form of the implant to be used for breast augmentation, and health controversies about one kind of implant that dominated news reports in 1990s. Many women who were more interested in having breasts were afraid to do because of these reports. The following section describes the different types of implants that are available, and addresses some concerns about the differences between the filler material for breast implants, shape, surface texture, size, manufacture and use of implants.
Filler for breast implants:
Although all breast implants are a solid silicone shell (bag), they are filled with various substances such as:
Saline breast implants
Although there are a number of implants available for breast augmentation, currently the most commonly used is the saline breast implant.
The saline implant has an outer bag solid silicone, which is filled with sterile saline solution - like the salt water solution which is administered by intravenous infusion. One advantage of this solution is its safety. If the implant due to a leak, the saline is simply absorbed by your body, as we used intravenous fluids before, during and after surgery. Yet another advantage of saline implants is a very low infection rate, which is usually within one to two percent.

One advantage of the saline implant is that it is filled with fluid after being inserted into the breast, therefore requiring only a small incision. This is in contrast to silicone implants which are pre-filled. Also, because saline implants are filled after insertion, their final volume can be adjusted making it easier to correct the existing breast asymmetry.
Unlike other types of implants such as silicone implants, there are no restrictions on the use of saline breast implants, and women do not need to enter any specific national breast study to qualify for their implementation, as they do for the implantation of silicone implants.
Widespread media reports that saline-filled implants can contract fungal contamination were discredited when he learned that the Canadian laboratory that released this finding relied heavily on implants that had been mailed. As such, there was no guarantee of sterility in the transport of these implants.
There are two main disadvantages of saline breast implants, compared to those filled with silicone. Given the liquid nature of saline, saline-filled implants tend to have a higher incidence of the wave, or the ability to be felt. Although rippling occurs in all saline implants, filling them according to manufacturer's recommendations, the placement of implants submuscular, and the existence of thicker breast skin and tissue minimizes a person's ability to see or feel a wrinkle on saline implants. Because silicone gel has a thicker consistency, it tends to spread much less, but sometimes it happens anyway.
The second potential disadvantage of saline implants over silicone breast implants is the difference in how they feel to the touch. Outside the body, silicone implants have a more natural consistency. In reality, this difference becomes less noticeable when implants are felt underneath the breast and muscle tissue.
Silicone Breast Implants
These are implants that are filled with silicone gel. More than 1.5 million American women currently have silicone breast implants. Some people think that the results of silicone implants in a more natural appearing breast. However, 15 years ago, the safety of these implants has been questioned in numerous media reports, and through the filing of numerous lawsuits again the implant manufacturers. Many afflictions, including autoimmune diseases and hardening of the breasts, were attributed to leakage of silicone into the bodies of women who have had these implants.
The facts of the case concerning silicone breast implants have been published by the FDA Food and Drug Administration ([http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2004/504_implants.html]):"In January 1992, the FDA requested a voluntary moratorium - a delay on the use of these implants - until new safety information could be reviewed in depth. The moratorium was not intended to" prohibit "implants, but rather to allow time to review the safety news.
In April 1992, the agency decided that no PMA yet submitted contained safety and sufficient data to support the efficacy of approval. However, access to these gel-filled breast implants to continue for women enrolled in certain clinical studies. In the years following this decision, thousands of women filed lawsuits against manufacturers of silicone gel-filled implants, saying the devices had caused serious ailments, such as connective tissue diseases, neurological diseases and cancer .
Consumer groups have filed petitions urging repeatedly in other studies on implants. But many women said they were satisfied with their implants, including cancer patients who had pleaded for the opportunity to choose silicone gel implants for reconstruction. In January 2004 - contrary to the recommendation of the advisory committee of the agency - the FDA has determined that the new silicone gel breast implant PMA was "not approvable" at that time. This meant that the implants were not approved for marketing pending additional information, but that women still have limited access to them by enrolling in clinical studies. "
Therefore, at this stage, only women who are enrolled in long-term clinical studies are allowed to have silicone breast implants. To be considered for these studies, a woman must need implants for breast reconstruction, repair of breast asymmetry or ptosis, or to have been among those who developed severe rippling with saline implants. Those who have lupus, scleroderma, autoimmune diseases or diseases that inhibit wound healing are excluded from the study.
The main disadvantage of silicone breast implants is that their rupture is less easily detectable by the rupture of saline implants. When a ruptured saline implants, the saline is absorbed by the body, making the chest flat, which can be easily recognized by a woman. Moreover, because the silicone gel remains mostly in the breast tissue and is not absorbed, it is generally not reduced breast size noted after rupture of silicone implants. Tools to detect rupture of silicone implants include Mammograms and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). In addition, clean and complete elimination of leakage of silicone gel is difficult. Finally, although there are several studies confirming the safety of silicone, the controversy over the safety of silicone implants remains.